We All Live In Disney's Submarine

The vultures in Disney's classic animated feature "The Jungle Book" were originally supposed to be played by the Beatles, but Walt Disney didn't feel they had staying power.  He felt that in a few years the British band would be forgotten, and didn't want to date his film with soon-to-be nobodies.

They didn't go on to do much, but, they some of their fans are still around.

Decades later Disney has come full circle.

ImageMovers Digital, the motion-capture division of Disney's various animation studios (which include Pixar Animation Studios, Disney Animation Studios, and DisneyToon Studios), is preparing to re-make the classic, traditionally-animated Beatles film "The Yellow Submarine" in 3D CGI, according to Variety.

This:

...will soon be this:

Disney is in negotiations to acquire the rights to 16 of the Beatles' songs.

Robert Zemeckis, who's ImageMovers Digital studio has been behind the films "The Polar Express", "Monster House", and this winter's "A Christmas Carol" will direct.

He's best known for directing the traditional animation/live-action hybrid "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?"

Disney is hoping for a 2012 release.

Read more at Variety.

Save Lumpy!

In 2011, the first hand-drawn Winnie the Pooh movie in six years will be released. "The movie is being produced by Walt Disney Animation Studios. This marks the first time in more than 35 years that a Winnie the Pooh motion picture is being produced at Walt Disney Animation Studios. Under the supervision of John Lasseter and producer, Clark Spencer ("Lilo & Stitch," "Bolt") the movie is due out in theaters spring 2011. Steve Anderson ("Meet the Robinsons") and Don Hall (head of story on "The Princess and The Frog") will co-direct. Burny Mattinson who worked as an animator on the original Winnie the Pooh and the Honey Tree featurette in 1964 will serve as the lead story artist on the project."

In 2005, Lumpy the Heffalump melted our hearts when he busted onto the screen in "Pooh's Heffalump Movie." His exuberance, loyalty, and silliness were the essence of an innocent childhood. Fans of the purple Heffalump, Heffridge Trumpler Brompet Heffalump the Fourth, need to join together to ensure Lumpy is in the film. It is possible that Disney will make this new Pooh film a direct sequel to the original, which would cut Lumpy out. If you're a fan of this heartwarming, purple Heffalump please express it by signing the petition and letting Disney know that Lumpy should be in the 2011 Winnie the Pooh sequel!

Please sign my petition!

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/Save-Lumpy

Then pass this along to all other Pooh and Lumpy fans you know of, as well as posting it at any related Disney news site, blog, or forum! Add it to your signatures on forums, as well!

A Return to Monstropolis?

Once upon several years ago, Pixarphiles could defend their favorite company against DreamWorks fans by saying "DreamWorks sucks, Pixar doesn't do all the sequels DreamWorks does!"

Well, they've quickly lost those bragging rights.

Sure, there was "Toy Story 2" - but Pixar never chose to do that. Disney began to produce the film as a direct-to-video sequel to the original "Toy Story" without Pixar's blessing. Pixar rushed in, and under the watchful eye of John Lasseter, turned the film around in a fraction of the time Pixar films are normally made, and made it theatrical quality. The rest is history - and "Toy Story 2" is considered one of the best film sequels ever, one of the few that matches (perhaps, even, surpasses) the original.

Between all the original films Pixar was doing, it seemed concrete that they weren't going to produce any more sequels.

Let's take a look at their film-lineup versus DreamWorks.

Pixar:

1995 - Toy Story

1998 - A Bug's Life

1999 - Toy Story 2

2001 - Monster's, Inc.

2003 - Finding Nemo

2004 - The Incredibles

2006 - Cars

2007 - Ratatouille

2008 - WALL-E

2009 - Up

2010 - Toy Story 3

2011 - Cars 2

2011 - The Bear and the Bow

2012 - Newt

...Three sequels in their history of animated features. Only one released as of me writing this.

DreamWorks:

1998 - The Prince of Egypt

2000 - The Road to El Dorado

2000 - Joseph: King of Dreams

2002 - Spirit: Stallion of the Cimarron

2003 - Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas

1998 - Antz

2001 - Shrek

2004 - Shrek 2

2004 - Shark Tale

2005 - Madagascar

2006 - Over the Hedge

2007 - Shrek the Third

2007 - Bee Movie

2008 - Kung Fu Panda

2008 - Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa

2009 - Monsters vs. Aliens

2010 - How to Train Your Dragon

2010 - Shrek Forever After

2010 - Oobermind

2011 - Kung Fu Panda: The Kaboom of Doom

2011 - The Guardians

2012 - Puss in Boots

2012 - Madagascar 3

...Two spin-offs and six sequels in their history of animated features. Three of the sequels and one of the spin-offs released as of me writing this.

So, Pixar still isn't as bad as DreamWorks in terms of milking their franchises (yet), but could Pixar's fourth sequel be on its way?

Pixar is known for having an elite ilk of directors oversee all their films. While their has been a host of co-directors assisting them - John Lasseter, Pete Docter, Andrew Stanton, and Brad Bird have been the leading men behind Pixar's currently released ten films.

However, their futures are largely tied up. Andrew Stanton and Brad Bird are both working on live-aciton films - "John Carter of Mars" and "1906" respectively. John Lasseter now busily oversees the outputs of Walt Disney Animation Studios, ImageMovers Digital, and Pixar Animation Studios as the Chief Creative Officer - he has no time to direct.

Lee Unkrich, previously only a co-director, is heading "Toy Story 3". Gary Rydstrom, who directed the short 'Lifted' will direct "Newt". Brenda Chapman, director of "The Prince of Egypt", will also direct, "The Bear and the Bow".

So that leaves Pete Docter - he's the only one not accounted for out of Pixar's top four directors.

Well, that may not be the case anymore.

The Liscensing Exposition at Las Vegas first brought us news of a new 2011 Winnie the Pooh film. However, that was publicly announced. A private , closed-doors meeting was held with liscensees about future, currently secret projects.

All attendees were sworn to secrecy (in writing), but nothing is sacred today in the entertainment world.

Reportedly, various attendees emerged from the private meeting buzzing about - "Monster's, Inc. 2".

Various sites are reporting the news, notably Jim Hill Media. Keep in mind, Jim Hill is notorious for his mistakes. Here is the quote from his site:

Well, though the buyers who attended these particular preview sessions were first sworn to secrecy by Disney officials, several immediately reached out to me afterwards to say how thrilled they were to learn that Pete Docter will be following up "Up" with a sequel to "Monsters, Inc."

Source: http://jimhillmedia.com/blogs/jim_hill/archive/2009/06/08/licensing-show-overview.aspx

John Lasseter once said, "If we have a great story, we'll do a sequel." Even so, Pixar fans and animation fans alike are not too excited about these sequels. "Cars", considered Pixar's worse film in the story department, is getting a sequel over the much more critically acclaimed, "The Incredibles", or the number one Pixar film at the box-office, "Finding Nemo".

Can we trust the report from Jim Hill? Maybe not.

However, Blue Sky Disney is generally an accurate site that breaks Disney news before other websites and turns out to be correct. Without revealing their sources, they simply stated the rumors are true:

The rumors are true...

It appears that Pete Docter has settled on his next directing gig and the film project is a familiar one. While he likely won't be talking about it until his press junkets are through for "Up," the feature that he'll be working on(and has been for a while) is the sequel to "Monster's Inc." with tentative plans for it being Pixar's 2013 release.

You heard it here guys...

Source: http://blueskydisney.blogspot.com/2009/02/just-what-docter-ordered.html

Other 'proof' that has amounted in recent months includes an MTV interview where Docter, asked about a sequel, stated:

When I followed up with Doctor about [the ideas for a sequel being considered] all he would say is "I can neither confirm nor deny". (And he did it in a nervous voice).

The Pixar Blog uncovered what sort of web searches were coming out of the Pixar studio, itself, and found the string 'monsters 2013 pixar' - in various combinations - was being Googled at Pixar.

Source: http://pixarblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/monsters-sequel-in-2013.html

At Comic-Con 2008, Docter said:

We’ve thought about it… We’ve got a couple ideas.

The Pixar Blog tried to ask Peter Sohn (director of 'Partly Cloudy) but were cut off by a Pixar publicist.

When I interviewed Peter Sohn last month I asked him about Monsters, Inc. 2 at the end of the call. He was about to say something —I can't...— but the Pixar publicist listening in made sure he didn't finish the sentence!

Source: http://pixarblog.blogspot.com/2009/06/monsters-inc-2-previewed-for-licensees.html

What do you think? Is there enough evidence to make it a fact in your eyes, or is there still room for doubt?

Let us know what you think in the comments!

"The Snow Queen" To Come In From The Cold?

I'll save you the finer details of the long-troubled production on "The Snow Queen" Disney animated feature and try to sum it up quickly.

The film was at one point a serious contender to join the Disney animated feature films legacy around 2002, but when Glen Keane left the project, news puttered out. Here's a snippet from an article regarding his departure:

Now Disney studio execs were understandably upset when Keane upped and quit The Snow Queen, a project extremely important to WDFA’s future since it will be their first feature length cartoon based on a classic fairy tale since the original Aladdin back in 1992. Mouse House execs are really counting on this movie to help the Walt Disney Company reconnect with its increasingly disenfranchised customers. So to have a big gun like Glen opt not to work on that project anymore (and take a flyer on something as flaky as Rapunzel) was really a blow. That said, Disney execs were still thrilled that Keane opted to stay at WDFA.

It seems as though 2003 was the end of the line for an animated "The Snow Queen".

In 2006, Disney's famed in-house composer Alan Menken was writing a stage musical version of the story but news of the project also halted.

Various names have been attached to the project over the years including the Brizzi brothers, Dick Zondag, and Dave Goetz. News has been spotty at best. The feature was finally proclaimed dead in the water by Disney fans when no more news emerged in several years.

In October 2008, concept art was shown off by Don Hahn at an event promoting his new book The Alchemy of Animation. However, no explanation of its status was given.

That art can be found here:

http://haraldsiepermann.blogspot.com/2008/07/blog-post.html

That blog belongs to animator Harald Siepermann. He stated the project was canceled in a March 2008 interview at Animated-Views:

The Snow Queen. Can you tell me about that?

HS: I worked together with Dick Zondag on The Snow Queen. I’ve known him since Balto, actually, which we did for Steven Spielberg animation. When the time came for The Snow Queen, they gave me call and then I did some first design based on a young Meryl Streep kind of character. Unluckily, the project was canceled because Disney didn’t want to go into fairytales anymore at that time. They said that they wanted something wise, witty and more modern, because at that time, you know, everybody said that the Disney formula was dead and nobody wanted to see princesses and stuff like that. So, that project was canceled, sadly. But I spent a couple of weeks on some Queens, trying different levels of caricature on her, some more cartoony, others less.

You can find the rest of that interview here: http://animated-views.com/2008/enchanted-interviews-chapter-four-harald-siepermann-and-troy-quane/

I e-mailed Mr. Siepermann and he had this to say:

Dear Neal,

Nice to hear from you. Anyway, I haven't heard from any Snowqueen-plans, which doesn't mean, that it's not going to happen, but so far nobody has talked to me about it. I'm sorry I can't help you out there, but I will keep my eyes and ears open.

Thank you, H

Whispers concerning this film's status have never ceased. Many a Disney animation project have come and gone in silence, however the exact status of "The Snow Queen"'s production has remained a popular debate in forums. The most recent rumors being that Mike Gabriel (co-director of "Pocahontas", "The Rescuers Down Under") was directing for a 2013 release and it would be traditionally animated. Dean Wellins (screenplay of "Rapunzel") has also been on-again, off-again reportedly attached to the project.

But, those are just rampant rumors.

Mike Gabriel didn't have much to tell me when I asked him A) If the film had resumed production, B) Was he the director, and C) Was it releasing in 2013? Here's his response:

Sorry dude, the studio doesn't want Snow Queen info out at this point. Thanks for the interest.

Now there's more fuel for the fire, and this time it seems to be legitimate news.

Alan Menken spoke to the Italian press recently while in Milan (where the stage version of "Beauty and the Beast" is about to open).

The interview, from a respected Italian newspaper, was posted yesterday. It seemed pretty clear that he is working on an animated "The Snow Queen". Here it is for you all to dissect:

(translated from Italian)

In his future at Disney?

I'm preparing the soundtracks of two cartoons, Rapunzel and Snow Queen, and of a live musical film feature of Beauty and the Beast. At the same time I am also working on a musical comedy that will debut in Autumn 2010, Leap of Faith.

You can find that interview here (warning: it's in Italian): http://www.lastampa.it/redazione/cmsSezioni/spettacoli/200906articoli/44340girata.asp

We all know that Menken is working on next year's Disney tentpole animated feature, the CGI "Rapunzel". How come he's mentioning "The Snow Queen" again? He clearly said 'cartoon'. He separated out Beauty and the Beast and Leap of Faith as live-action.

Perhaps I'm reading too far into it, but I think it's interesting that while I called it "The Snow Queen" in my e-mail, Mike Gabriel merely referred to it as 'Snow Queen'. Alan Menken also simply called it 'Snow Queen'. No The affixed. Simple coincidence? Finally, Mike Gabriel didn't say "that project was canceled" (a response I got from a Disney animator when I asked about the status of once-Disney animation project "Joe Jump"). Instead, he said Disney wants no information out at this point. That's not a "yes, production has resumed", but it's also not a "no, that project is dead".

Again, maybe I'm just reading too far into this.

Between this winter's "The Princess and the Frog", the first traditionally-animated film in five years and first Broadway-style princess film since 1992's "Aladdin" and next year's CGI "Rapunzel", it seems as if Disney is willing to do 'traditional' projects again, not just 'hip' or 'modern' ones. 2D is back for sure now, because we know 2011 will bring a new hand-drawn Winnie the Pooh film. So traditional-animation is back and serious films are okay for Disney again. Could John Lasseter, current savior of Walt Disney Animation Studios, have seen the potential in this film and resurrected the project?

No legitimate news since 2005, but now Menken has stirred the debate up again. We know this is a different Disney than a few years ago when the project was canceled. Does this mean "The Snow Queen" is back?

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments!

A New Pooh For You, By John Lasseter, Too!

There has been considerable worry surrounding Disney's first traditionally-animated feature film in five years, "The Princess and the Frog." Apart from racial issues, Disney animation fans have been concerned that the film's success was hinged to the future of 2D theatrical animation at Disney. Essentially, only if the froggy picture was a success this winter, would Walt Disney Animation Studios greenlight more hand-drawn theatrical features.

Those worries can be put to rest. More than five months from the premiere of Disney's latest animated film, the first to be traditionally-animated since 2004's "Home on the Range", a new 2D film has been announced.

The film will star a familiar, silly ol' bear. His name? Winnie the Pooh.

News broke from the 2009 Licensing Exposition in Las Vegas this past Tuesday. The official press release is as follows:

New Mickey Mouse and Winnie the Pooh Initiatives

Mickey Mouse and Winnie the Pooh remain among the company's key character franchises; for a broad cross-section of consumers, these two classic characters boast a deep emotional connection and an unrivaled affinity like no other. In support of this, DCP has developed comprehensive plans to propel the growth of these classic character properties and keep them "top of mind" across demographics.

Beginning with Winnie the Pooh, DCP and Walt Disney Animation Studios today announced a new theatrical film planned for spring 2011, making it Pooh's first theatrical release in six years since Pooh's Heffalump Movie in 2005. DCP will focus merchandise strategy on moms of infants and toddlers, with a secondary focus on women. Other Disney businesses, including Disney Publishing, are developing Pooh content for a new generation of consumers that will further drive the growth potential of this classic character.

Already uproar has shot through various Disney and animation blogs and forums. Some fans are pleased to see a new 2D film without Disney relying on "The Princess and the Frog" to test the market. Those same fans are excited to see their favorite stuffed bear return to the big screen after a four-year hiatus, especially in 2D and not the CGI seen in his latest TV Show, "My Friends Tigger & Pooh."

The other reactions have been negative at best. Disney fans are in disbelief that after touting "The Princess and the Frog" as a return to classic animation, Disney has chosen to follow with a sequel. The problem is the original 1977 film Winnie the Pooh has had nearly a dozen sequel films and TV shows spin off of it. For many, Pooh has been sucked dry and is now a lifeless, ragged old toy. So, while they aren't necessarily against the idea of a sequel, these enraged fans are against a Pooh sequel.

The counter-argument has been that if Disney wants to ensure a successful return to 2D after the market has been dominated and over-saturated by CGI for the last five years, than they need to produce something familiar to consumers. Hence, a Princess film and a Pooh film.

Fans have hopes that bolder, original animation projects will follow.

The aforementioned press release left doubt as to which studio was animating the picture, which caused further debate in forums. At face value, it sounded like Walt Disney Animation Studios - creators of all the 'classics' (spanning from 1937's "Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs" to last year's "BOLT"). Others remained un-convinced and thought that it had to be DisneyToon Studios, creators of the many 'cheapquels' (The Lion King 2: Simba's Pride, Cinderella III: A Twist in Time).

Well, I was determined to find out for myself. I pulled out my Disney contacts list and shot off an e-mail to every Disney higher-up I had. It was a little desperate, but hey, I got results!

My e-mail to Disney Motion Pictures Group President Mark Zoradi was forwarded to Disney spokeswoman Heidi Trotta.

The information she has sent is breaking news! No other report has had this information. Currently, all news reports about this new 2011 Winnie the Pooh film merely echo one another and are very vague. My report below includes major updates!

I will post her e-mail first, followed by my original e-mail to Mark Zoradi, where she has posted her answers.

Hi Neal:

Your e-mail was forwarded to me for response.
My answers are below in red.

Thank you so much for
your interest.

Best,

Heidi

~~~

Dear Mr. Zoradi,

Disney Animation fans are excited about the newly announced Winnie the Pooh feature film arriving in Spring 2011.

This was exciting news to come out of the Licensing Exposition in Las Vegas yesterday.

However, there is some confusion that is causing an uproar across forums and blogs. Is this film being animated at and/or by Walt Disney Animation Studios? The movie is being produced by Walt Disney Animation Studios. This marks the first time in more than 35 years that a Winnie the Pooh motion picture is being produced at Walt Disney Animation Studios. Under the supervision of John Lasseter and producer, Clark Spencer ("Lilo & Stitch," "Bolt") the movie is due out in theaters spring 2011. Steve Anderson ("Meet the Robinsons") and Don Hall (head of story on "The Princess and The Frog") will co-direct. Tidbit: Burny Mattinson who worked as an animator on the original Winnie the Pooh and the Honey Tree featurette in 1964 will serve as the lead story artist on the project.

The studio is seen in the website below: http://www.disneyanimation.com/aboutus/history.html

Is that Walt Disney Animation Studios animating this new Spring 2011 Winnie the Pooh feature? Yes

If not, who/which studio is in charge of animating the upcoming film?

If so, does that make it one of the 'classics' or 'canon' films, also represented at the aforementioned website. Yes

Your assistance with these questions is highly appreciated. If you could just take a moment to clear up the confusion to settle down fans who are up in arms, that would be great!

Thank you in advance,

Neal Patten

There you have it, Disney animation fans! This is officially a Disney Animated Classic and will be hitting the big screens Spring 2011!

This marks only the third (maybe fourth) official sequel within the Disney Animated Classics Line:

Fantasia and Fantasia 2000
The Rescuers and The Rescuers Down Under
(Possibly) Saludos Amigos and The Three Caballeros

Not only that, but it is going to be traditionally animated!

So, are you excited or not? Please sound off in the comments section!

'The Black Cauldron: Special Edition' DVD coming 2009

Our first indication that "The Black Cauldron" was going to see a re-release came on New Years.

A Thailand-based DVD distributor held a New Year's party and handed out booklets that showed their 2009 Disney DVD release slate. "The Black Cauldron" was listed in the book for a 2009 re-release:

I e-mailed Disney's consume relations but their response was:

We don't have any information on that title as of yet.

Well, there's information now!

Disney's imported, dubbed film "The Secret of the Magic Gourd " is coming to DVD on January 27th. One of the previews is for a 'The Black Cauldron: Special Edition'. This was revealed on the Hi-Def Digest forums:

http://forums.highdefdigest.com/blu-ray-software-general-discussion/71104-disney-chooses-re-release-mary-poppins-dvd-not-blu-ray-4.html#post1376273

All there is is a trailer. We have no further information. This could possibly contain some of the infamous cuts made to the film, that is not known. Also, The film was restored around 2002 by a comapny called Lowry Digital to make a 2k Master from the original negative. This restored version of the film has been put on DVD in France and Korea, but not in the U.S.

There has only been one Region 01 DVD release in the states before, and many Disney fans have complained about the edits, the lack of anamorphic widescreen, and a poor transfer. This 'special edition' may be Disney's response to that.

Don't hold your breath for the cuts being on the DVD, but it's safe to say this will have anamorphic widescreen and be the restoration.


"The Black Cauldron" released in 1985. It was Disney's first PG-rated animated classic. It has since fallen into minor obscurity and is not often recognized by Disney.

Ponyo in a Theater in the States

Legendary filmmaker Hayao Miyazaki's highly-anticipated next film Ponyo on the Cliff by the Sea now has an English voice cast announced.

GhibliWorld is reporting that Frank Marshall and Kathleen Kennedy will produce the English localization of Hayao Miyazaki's Ponyo on the Cliff by the Sea. The cast includes Matt Damon, Tina Fey, Cate Blanchett, Liam Neeson, Lily Tomlin, Betty White, Frankie Jonas, Noah Cyrus and Cloris Leachman.

The film tells the story of a young boy who befriends a goldfish princess who longs to become human.

The film, which has already released in Japan, is going to come stateside next year. It is being said that it will hit the silver screen during the first quarter of 2009, due to the comic series debuting in April and the "Art of" book arriving in March. It's believed the film will release soon after to coincide with the book and comic.

Looking Back At Notre Dame: The Second Installment

The second part of Floyd Norman's retrospective on The Hunchback of Notre Dame is out.

Follow this link to read it.

The Art of American Dog

     For those of you who've by some strange force of nature still haven't heard the story of American Dog, it goes a little something like this. Animator Chris Sanders, co-director of the classic Disney animated film Lilo & Stitch, was developing his sophomore Disney effort in 2005. The film was called American Dog and the plot was as follows:

Henry, a famous TV dog, finds himself stranded in the Nevada desert. Out in the world for the first time, Henry's tidy life of scripted triumph has come to an end, and his 2,000 mile trek through the real world is just beginning.Henry is a popular dog. He stars in his own television series, in which he is a James Bond style secret agent who manages to survive the most wonderful adventures. Henry is the toast of the town, but then one day one of the stunts in his show goes terribly wrong, Henry loses consciousness, and when he wakes up he finds himself on a train, thousands of miles away from his home. Henry has been a celebrity all his lifeand does not know how to handle himself in this new situation, but luckily he is able to make some new friends that he convinces to get him back home.

After showing at SIGGRAPH 2005, the buzz began for what was going to be Meet the Robinsons' (then titled A Day with Wilbur Robinson) follow-up. Things seemed to be going well. A batch of lavish concept art was released to the public that drew inspiration of Edward Hopper and the film was on track for a summer 2008 release.

Well, all that changed in December 2006 when, in the midst of lay-offs at the Mouse House, Sanders was fired.

Rumors of the who and why began to fly but the now accepted version of the tale states that John Lasseter, the savior of Disney himself, gave the orders.

Why? Why would the creator of one of Disney's most succesful and marketable products in a decade be removed from a second go-around. It didn't suit Lasseter's tastes.

He called it “too quirky for its own good” and demanded a host of changes be made. Lasseter is noted for not liking Lilo & Stitch, so it's believed he didn't go into the American Dog screening room with an open mind. What changes were ordered? First off, there was too much style but not enough story substance in his opinion. Secondly, the Nevada location was too close to Pixar's upcoming Cars. Thirdly, the plot went up against Toy Story 3's. Who was going to win that fight when Lasseter was the referee?So after Sanders refused to make changes to his baby, he was given the boot and replaced with the same rescuer of another, quite similar story of drastic change - the director of The Emperor's New Groove.

It's believed Lasseter wanted to play it safe with his first CGI Disney film where he had full-jurisdiction. It's said he wants to bury any knowledge of the existence of Chicken Little and he also pushed changes with Meet the Robinsons but joined the game too late to fix all he wanted.However, this time, he knew the movie he would release would be a testament to his managing savvy and so he wanted to create something that had no risks to it. The old story was just 'too risky' for him.

What changed? The deserts of Nevada became the streets of New York.

• Henry, the misshapen even moose-looking brown dog became Bolt, the American White Shepherd.
• Ogo, the eye-patched cat became Mr. Mittens - your typical street ruffian feline.
• The unnamed gargantuan, nuclear-waste morphed bunny became Rhino, an otaku highly excitable hamster in a ball.
• Henry went from getting lost but knowing he was just a star with no powers, having to come to terms with no longer being pampered to being Bolt, a dog who believes he's actually has powers and is solely focused on rescuing his owner Penny.

I've never gotten over the change. I still feel they made the story into something generic - it feels like recycled bits of Cars and Toy Story - and made the characters too saccharine and glib. Even so, people are saying the new film is still funny and shows Disney's on the right track again despite this films soiled history.

Therefore, I began to come to terms with the switcheroo. No sooner had I begun to accept the change than did the wound get opened again when I read Cartoon Brew's review of The Art of Bolt book.

I held out hope some hope some remnant of Sanders would show up. Did it? Nope. Nothing. Not one image. Not even his name. Yet they still have the gall to claim the inspirtation of Edward Hopper - that was Sanders' big buzz line.Sanders has moved on over to DreamWorks but expressed deep sadness and anger over losing his pet project. His comments echoed mine - why would Lasseter, a man who claims Disney is now a "director-driven studio" - so strongly go against his own mantra? Maybe those bright hawaiian shirts should just be business suits, after all.

It seems Disney just wants to wipe their hands clean of this whole debacle.

Because of this, I've made my own art of "book". I've collected every image I've ever attained from Sanders' American Dog and posted it below. Enjoy. If you have any more pieces, or know the name of that bunny - please contact me!

The Original Title Card For American Dog

Theatrical Poster for American Dog

The Display At SIGGRAPH 2005

Original Concept Sketches For Henry

Original Concept Sketch For Ogo

The Film Was To Take Place In The Deserts Of Nevada

Perhaps Ogo Channels Kill Bill?

Henry Had To Learn To Overcome His Ego And Meet Normal People

Henry Seems A Bit Scared Of His Soon-To-Be Companions

A Still Shows CGI Henry, Ogo, and Radioactive Bunny at the Magic of Disney Animation at MGM Studios

Stills From Footage Shown at SIGGRAPGH 2005

Henry Was A James Bond -like Character In His Show

Slowly Henry Becomes More Accustomed To The Real World

Ogo And Henry In A Garage, Believed To Be Ogo And The Bunny's Home

Henry Steals From Mobsters At a Casino - In Real Life Or A Sketch From His Show?

Henry Awakes On The Train As It Passes Mt. Rushmore

Closer View Of Kill Bill Ogo

Oops! There Goes Henry!

Wild Car Chase? Just Another Average Day...

A Closer View Of The Coffee House

Closer More Henry & Gang

Isn't he debonair?

The Story Behind "The Hunchback of Notre Dame"

Once Disney animator Floyd Norman has written the first installment of a retrospective on Disney's thirty-fourth full-length animated feature The Hunchback of Notre Dame.

The Hunchback of Notre Dame" was my return to animation after a ten-year absence. In fact, I never thought that I'd return to animation since I had found a new love. I was writing comics and children's books for Disney Publishing, and having a ball with my newfound freedom. This was a job I could do forever. However, the wild and wacky management of Michael Eisner decided otherwise. So I was booted out.

You can read the rest of this interesting look-back at the film here, on Jim Hill Media.